Meeting customer expectations in product development

Many organizations, when launching new products into the market, fail to capture the attention of the targeted customer. This is a result of a breakdown in translating the consumers' expectations into the final product. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a structured process that captures the expectations of the customer based on market research and benchmarking with competitors. It then translates them into technical design specifications. It highlights the critical process operations for each technical description and finally draws out the production requirements and lifetime support of the product needed to materialize the consumer's wants and needs. The customers' requirements may be explicit and at other times the needs may be incredible benefits that he/she may not know about but will be willing to experience, as witnessed in innovative products. As such QFD breaks down organization’s silos (read departments) and aligns the application of resources by bringing about prioritization and cross-functional ownership.


Fig 1: Broken communication lines leading to misinterpretation of customers’ expectations

QFD uses a matrix format and a rating scale to address and assess the indicators which are vital for the planning processes. QFD manifests itself in a structure that is known as the house of quality which is a conceptual framework that provides a means for cross-functional planning and communication. The house of quality gets its name from the triangular roof-like appearance of the correlation matrix which sits on top of the tool. To transform the customer's requirements into a final product or service, QFD works out in four phases. They are, the voice of the customer, the voice of the engineer, the parts design specifications and the manufacturing specifications. Each of the four phases is represented by a house of quality.

Fig 2: The four phases of quality function deployment

The first house of quality is the voice of the customer. The inputs (AKA What’s) for this house are the customer requirements while the functional requirements (AKA How’s) are the engineering requirements needed to satisfy the customer's needs. This matrix defines the product and is usually led by the sales and marketing department as they have first-hand experience with the users. The second house of quality is the voice of the engineer. To enable consistency and to ensure that the communication chain is not broken during the transition, the How’s of the preceding house become the what of the next house, as such, the engineering requirements become the input while the various parts characteristics required to fulfil the engineering needs becomes the functional requirements. This enables the product to be visualized and developed. This phase is led by the product engineering design team.

The third house, the parts design specification, has the characteristics of the parts as its inputs while the parts processes operations required to achieve the individual parts design become the functional requirements. This develops the necessary processes, process flow and parameters required to achieve each designed part. This phase is led by the manufacturing engineering team. In the final house i.e. the manufacturing specifications house, the parts processes operations become the inputs while the production process requirements necessary for the assembly of the components into the final product becomes the functional requirements. This gives the process guidelines and controls to guarantee the fulfilment of the customer's requirements. In this phase, performance indicators to monitor the production processes are put in place, as such this phase is led by the quality assurance team. With the transition of information from one team to the other, there needs to be a consistent member(s) who manages the transformation of information and manage the pathway from initial customer request to the delivery of the final product


The house of quality is a planning matrix that shows the relationship between the what’s and the how’s that an organization can use to achieve the input requirements of the various phases of QFD. In its general format, the house of quality is made up of seven rooms. They are, the input requirements, the input requirements priority rating, the functional requirements, the relationship matrix, the correlation matrix, the competition assessment, and the functional requirements importance rating.

Fig 3: The House of Quality

  • Input Requirements (What’s)
The initial step in forming the house of quality includes determining, clarifying and specifying the input needs. The inputs lay the foundation for a clearly defined venture that will ensure the planning is well thought out prior to any development. It is important to translate the inputs to tangible values that can be turned into functional specifications. Some of the inputs may be national standards that need to be adhered to. Depending on the phase of QFD the inputs may be customer requirements, engineering requirements, parts design specification or the process operations.
  • Input requirements priority rating
The input requirements may impact each other adversely. To overcome such conflict, the requirements are assigned priorities. The priorities must reflect the preference of the input requirements. The input priority column is found to the right of the input requirements.
  • Functional requirements (How’s)
The functional requirements investigate how the input demands will be achieved. The functional requirements should be tangible, measurable and should satisfy the input requirements. The functional requirements are manipulated directly or indirectly to influence the input needs. There should be at least one functional requirement for each demanded input. Depending on the phase of QFD, the functional requirements may be, the engineering requirements, the characteristics of the parts, the parts process operations or the production requirements.
  • Relationship Matrix
This matrix establishes the connection between the input requirements and the functional requirements. The relationship between the input requirements and the functional requirements is portrayed by symbols which indicate a strong, medium or weak relationship. The symbols are assigned indexes say 9-strong, 3-medium, and 1-weak. When no relationship is evident between a pair, a zero value is assigned. The relationship matrix follows the Pareto principle where 20% of the functional requirements satisfy about 80% of the input requirements. As such, there shouldn't be a significant number of strong relationships between pairs.
  • Correlation Matrix
The correlation matrix is used in developing the relationship between the functional requirements concerning the input requirements. It identifies opportunities where the functional requirements conflict with each other and where they can build synergy. As such, it uses symbols to identify interrelationships. The negative sign (-) is used to show a negative relationship while the double negative sign is used to indicate a strong negative relationship. A positive sign (+) is used to portray a positive relationship while a double positive image is used to denote a strong positive relationship. These symbols are entered at the cross-section of conflicting or synergistic functional requirements to highlight them. In some cases, negative or strong negative relationships of functional requirements mean that the design might have to be compromised unless the negative functional requirement can be designed out. Negative impacts may also represent constraints where an improvement of one functionality may be detrimental to another functionality. Empty rows in the correlation matrix indicate unaddressed input requirements thus the functional requirements need to be revisited and adjusted accordingly and if necessary, add a functional requirement that needs to be identified. Empty columns, on the other hand, indicate redundancy and unnecessary functional requirements which may not be traced back to any input requirements. The correlation matrix flags any contentious issue so that it may be resolved before moving to the next phase of QFD.
  • Competition Assessment
Competition assessment involves the identification of available systems or products capable of responding to the input requirements. Input requirement perceptions are then benchmarked relative to how well the competition satisfies the set requirements. The purpose of this effort is to highlight the absolute strengths and weaknesses of a product or service in the marketplace and areas where the new product deserves improvement. This brings about invaluable insights into avenues where competitive gains can be made effectively
  • Functional requirements importance rating
this is the output of the house of quality. It is a set of values for each functional requirement that needs to be met by the new design. The functional importance rating takes into account all the other six rooms in the house of quality; thus, it specifies the feasible design space and impacts the subsequent design decisions. At times, organizations are not able to develop the optimum design due to constraints such as costs, technology, and other related items.
As from the above methodology, QFD helps build quality from upstream by understanding the raw voice of the customer. It then translates these demands through its four phases into discrete technical parameters and finally builds and delivers a quality product or service by focusing the organization towards meeting or exceeding customer expectations. Like other systems, GIGO also applies to QFD, Gold In, Gold Out.




Author Profile

Eng. Moshe M. O. Ojanga, PE, MIEK






No comments:

Post a Comment